3. War, Peace, & Everything: Thoughts on Tolstoy

History, Big History, & Metahistory
DOI: 10.37911/9781947864023.03

3. War, Peace, & Everything: Thoughts on Tolstoy

Author: John Lewis Gaddis, Yale University

 

Excerpt

What Clausewitz and Tolstoy were trying to do was to derive from the experiences of history the laws governing it. Although they failed, these 19th-century thinkers, each operating from a different perspective, anticipated what we’ve come to call chaos and complexity theory.

There is a curious moment in Tolstoy’s account of the Battle of Borodino—page 774 in the new Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky translation of War and Peace—when two of the central characters of the novel, Pierre Bezukhov and Prince Andrei Bolkonsky, are interrupted by the sound of hoofbeats, look up, and see Carl von Clausewitz and another officer riding by. One of the horsemen is saying to the other: “War must be extended in space. I cannot put too high a price on this view.” The other agrees: “The aim is to weaken the enemy, so one cannot pay attention to the loss of private persons.” This disgusts Andrei, whose family estate lies within the space through which this particular war is to be extended. “[A]ll there is in a German head,” he complains bitterly to Pierre, “is reasoning, which isn’t worth a tinker’s damn. . . . They gave him [Napoleon] the whole of Europe and came to teach us. Fine teachers!” [6, p.117-19; 10, p.774].

Pierre and Prince Andrei were at Borodino only in Tolstoy’s imagination, but Clausewitz really was there: when Napoleon invaded Russia in 1812, Clausewitz resigned his commission in the Prussian Army, joined the Russians, and participated in the great battle [7]. The meticulous Tolstoy would have known this, and could well have read Clausewitz’s great work On War, published posthumously in 1832, before writing War and Peace in the 1860s. If he did, Tolstoy’s portrayal suggests that, like many other readers of Clausewitz, he misunderstood the point of the book. For not only are there similarities in the way that Clausewitz and Tolstoy depicted war, they also appear to have shared a sense of the relationship between theory and reality. And that relationship, in turn, relates to everything else.

Begin with war. Here is a famous passage from Clausewitz, which leaves no doubt that he knows what he’s writing about:

Let us accompany a novice to the battlefield. As we approach, the rumble of guns grows louder and alternates with the whir of cannonballs, which begin to attract his attention. Shots begin to strike close around us. We hurry up the slope where the commanding general is stationed with his large staff. Here cannonballs and bursting shells are frequent, and life begins to seem more serious than the young man had imagined. Suddenly someone you know is wounded; then a shell falls among the staff. You notice that some of the officers act a little oddly; you yourself are not as steady and collected as you were: even the bravest can become slightly distracted. Now we enter the battle raging before us, still almost like a spectacle, and join the nearest division commander. Shot is falling like hail, and the thunder of our own guns adds to the din. Forward to the brigadier, a solder of acknowledged bravery, but he is careful to take cover behind a rise, a house, or a clump of trees. A noise is heard that is a certain indication of increasing danger—the rattling of grapeshot on roofs and on the ground. Cannonballs tear past, whizzing in all directions, and musketballs begin to whistle around us. A little further we reach the firing line, where the infantry endures the hammering for hours with incredible steadfastness. The air is filled with hissing bullets that sound like a sharp crack if they pass close to one’s head. For a final shock, the sight of men being killed and mutilated moves our pounding hearts to awe and pity.

References

[1] Alroy, J., M. Aberhan, D. J. Bottjer, M. Foote, F. T. Fursich, P. J. Harries, A. J. Hendy, S. M. Holland, L. C. Ivany, W. Kiessling, M. A. Kosnik, C. R. Marshall, A. J. McGowan, A. I. Miller, T. D. Olszewski, M. E. Patzkowsky, S. E. Peters, L. Villier, P. J. Wagner, N. Bonuso, P. S. Borkow, B. Brenneis, M. E. Clapham, L. M. Fall, C. A. Ferguson, V. L. Hanson, A. Z. Krug, K. M. Layou, E. H. Leckey, S. Nurnberg, C. M. Powers, J. A. Sessa, C. Simpson, A. Tomasovych, and C. C. Visaggi. “Phanerozoic Trends in the Global Diversity of Marine Invertebrates.” Science 321(5885) (2008): 97-100.

[2] Alroy, J., C. R. Marshall, R. K. Bambach, K. Bezusko, M. Foote, F. T. Fursich, T. A. Hansen, S. M. Holland, L. C. Ivany, D. Jablonski, D. K. Jacobs, D. C. Jones, M. A. Kosnik, S. Lidgard, S. Low, A. I. Miller, P. M. Novack-Gottshall, T. D. Olszewski, M. E. Patzkowsky, D. M. Raup, K. Roy, J. J. Sepkoski, Jr., M. G. Sommers, P. J. Wagner, and A. Webber. “Effects of Sampling Standardization on Estimates of Phanerozoic Marine Diversification.” PNAS 96 (2001): 6261-6266.

[3] Brown, T. A., M. K. Jones, W. Powell, and R. G. Allaby. “The Complex Origins of Domesticated Crops in the Fertile Crescent.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24 (2008): 103-109.

[4] Cisne, J. L. “How science survived: Medieval manuscripts’ “demography” and classic texts’ extinction.” Science 307 (2005):1305-1307.

[5] Cleland, C. E. “Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science”. Philosophy of Science 69 (2002):474-496.

[6] Declercq, G. 2005 Comment on “How science survived: Medieval manuscripts’ “demography” and classic texts’ extinction”. Science 310:1618b

[7] Dingus, L., and P. M. Sadler. “The Effects of Stratigraphic Completeness on Extimates of Evolutionary Rates.” Syst. Zool 31 (1982): 400-412.

[8] Eldredge, N. “A brief history of piston-valved cornets.” Historical Brass Society Journal. 14 (2002): 337-390.

[9] Erwin, D. H. Extinction: How Life Nearly Died 250 Million Years Ago. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006. 

[10] Erwin, D. H. “Extinction as the Loss of Evolutionary History.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA (2008).

[11] Erwin, D. H. “Climate as a Driver of Evolutionary Change.” Current Biology 19 (2009): R575-R583.

[12] Foote, M. “Origination and Extinction Components of Taxonomic Diversity: General Problems.” Paleobiology, Supp. to Issue 4(27) (2000): 74-102.

[13] Foote, M. “Origination and Extinction through the Phanerozoic: A New Approach.” Journal of Geology 111 (2003): 125-148.

[14] Gillespie, R. “Community Assembly through Adaptive Radiaion in Hawaiian Spiders.” Science 303 (2004): 356-359.

[15] Gilman, S. L. and Glaze, F. E. “How Science Survived—Medieval manuscripts as fossils”. Science 307 (2005):1208-1209.

[16] Gogarten, J. P., W. F. Doolittle, and J. G. Lawrence. “Prokaryotic Evolution in Light of Gene Transfer.” Mol Biol Evol 19(12) (2002): 2226-2238.

[17] Gould, S. J. Wonderful Life. New York: Norton, 1989.

[18] Gray, R. D., and Q. D. Atkinson. “Language-Tree Divergence Times Support the Anatolian Theory of Indo-European Origin.” Nature 426(6965) (2003): 435-439.

[19] Losos, J. B., T. R. Jackman, A. Larson, K. de Queiroz, and L. Rodriguez-Schettino. “Contingency and Determinism in Replicated Adaptive Radiations of Island Lizards.” Science 279 (1998): 21115-2118.

[20] Luo, Z. X. “Transformation and Diversification in Early Mammal Evolution.” Nature 450 (2007): 1011-1019.

[21] Lyman, R. L., and M. J. O’Brien. “Nomothetic science and ideographic history in Twentieth-Century Americanist anthropology”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 40(2004): 77-96.

[22] Mace, R., C. Holden, and S. Shennan. The Evolution of Cultural Diversity. London: University College, London Press, 2005.

[23] Mace, R., and C. J. Holden. “A Phylogenetic Approach to Cultural Evolution.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20 (2005): 116-121.

[24] Marshall, C. R. “Confidence Intervals on Stratigraphic Ranges.” Paleobiology 16 (1990): 1-10.

[25] O’Hara, R. J. “Homage to Clio, or, Toward an historical philosophy for evolutionary biology.” Systematic Zoology 37(1988):142-155.

[26] Pagel, M., Q. D. Atkinson, and A. Meade. “Frequency of Word-Use Predicts Rates of Lexical Evolution throughout Indo-European History.” Nature 449 (2007): 717-720.

[27] Raup, D. M. “Taxonomic Diversity Estimation Using Rarefaction.” Paleobiology 1 (1975): 333-342.

[28] Raup, D. M. “Species Diversity in the Phanerozoic.” Paleobiology 2 (1976a): 279-288.

[29] Raup, D. M. “Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: an interpretation.” Paleobiology 2 (1976b): 289-297.

[30] Sadler, P. M. “Quantitative Biostratigraphy—Achieving Finer Resolution in Global Correlation.” Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 32 (2004): 187-213.

[31] Sepkoski, J. J., Jr. “A Kinetic Model of Phanerozoic Taxonomic Diversity II. Early Paleozoic Families and Multiple Equilibria.” Paleobiology 5 (1979): 222-251.

[32] Sepkoski, J. J., Jr. “A Factor Analytic Description of the Phanerozoic Marine Fossil Record.” Paleobiology 7 (1981): 36-53.

[33] Sepkoski, J. J., Jr. “A Compendium of Fossil Marine Families.” Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology 51 (1982): 125.

[34] Sepkoski, J. J., Jr. “A Kinetic Model of Phanerozoic Taxonomic Diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic Families and Mass Extinction.” Paleobiology 10 (1984): 246-267.

[35] Sepkoski, J. J., Jr. “Biodiversity: Past, Present, and Future.” Journal of Paleontology 71 (1997): 533-539.

[36] Smith, A. B. “Large-Scale Heterogeneity of the Fossil Record: Implications for Phanerozoic Biodiversity Studies.” Philisophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London. Ser. B 356 (2001): 351-367.

[37] Smith, A. B. “Marine Diversity through the Phanerozoic: Problems and Prospects.” Journal of the Geological Soc., London 164 (2007): 731-745.

[38] Stanley, S. M. “An Analysis of the History of Marine Animal Diversity.” Paleobiology 33(4s) (2007): 1-55.

[39] Temkin, I., and Eldredge, N. “Phylogenetics and material cultural evolution”. Current Anthropology 48 (2007): 146.153. 

[40] Valentine, J. W. “How Many Marine Invertebrate Fossil Species? A New Approximation.” Journal of Paleonotology 44 (1970): 410-415.

[41] Vermeij, G. J. “Historical Contingency and the Purported Uniqueness of Evolutionary Innovations.” PNAS 103 (2006): 1804-1809.

[42] Zeder, M. A., E. Emshwiller, B. D. Smith, and D. G. Bradley. “Documenting Domestication: The Intersection of Genetics and Archaeology.” Trends in Genetics 22 (2006): 139-155.

[43] Zhaxybayeva, O., and J. P. Gogarten. “Cladogenesis, Coalescence and the Evolution of the Three Domains of Life.” Trends in Genetics 20 (2004): 182-187.

BACK TO History, Big History, & Metahistory